Penerapan Model Problem Based Learning pada Mata Pelajaran Dasar Listrik dan Elektronika di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Muhammad Gunalan
Mukhlidi Muskhir

Abstract

This study aims to see the impact of applying the PBL (Problem Based Learning) model to the learning outcomes of class X students majoring in Electric Power Installation Engineering (TTL), amounting to 30 people. The achievement of student learning outcomes in knowledge competence is still disappointing with an average student score of 57.6. One of the reasons is the teacher-centered learning techniques still being applied by the teacher. As a result, students have difficulty in understanding the material which results in students' dislike for certain subjects. This study uses an experimental method with pre-experimental type One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design. Based on the results of the study, there was an increase in student learning outcomes in knowledge competencies with an average of 73.13. Based on the results of the analysis of the formula effect size can be seen the results of the pretest with a posttest worth 1.43 with the category of Large (Large Effect)

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

[1] M. Korber and D. Oesch, “Vocational versus general education: Employment and earnings over the life course in Switzerland,” Adv. Life Course Res., vol. 40, pp. 1–13, 2019.
[2] H. Biemans, M. Mulder, and R. Wesselink, “Competence-based VET in the Netherlands :,” J. Vocat. Educ. Train., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 523–538, 2004.
[3] A. Volodina, C. Lindner, and J. Retelsdorf, “Personality traits and basic psychological need satisfaction: Their relationship to apprentices’ life satisfaction and their satisfaction with vocational education and training,” Int. J. Educ. Res., vol. 93, no. July, pp. 197–209, 2019.
[4] F. Eliza, S. Suriyadi, and D. T. P. Yanto, “Peningkatan Kompetensi Psikomotor Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning ( PjBL ) di SMKN 5 Padang : PDS Project,” INVOTEK J. Inov. Vokasional dan Teknol., vol. 19, no. 2, 2019.
[5] Arends, Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivitis. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher, 2014.
[6] S. Billett, “Co-participation at work: Knowing and working knowledge,” Work. Knowledge, Product. Learn. Work, 2001.
[7] W. Wu and B. Hyatt, “Experiential and Project-based Learning in BIM for Sustainable Living with Tiny Solar Houses,” Procedia Eng., vol. 145, pp. 579–586, 2016.
[8] O. Candra, C. Dewi, D. T. P. Yanto, and H. Hastuti, “The Implementation of Power Electronics Training to Enhance Student Learning Activities in the Power Electronics Learning Process,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 362–373, 2020.
[9] M. Christidis, “Vocational knowing in subject integrated teaching: A case study in a Swedish upper secondary health and social care program,” Learn. Cult. Soc. Interact., vol. 21, no. January, pp. 21–33, 2019.
[10] M. Mulder, T. Weigel, and K. Collins, “The concept of competence in the development of vocational education and training in selected EU member states: A critical analysis,” J. Vocat. Educ. Train., vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 67–88, 2007.
[11] Sugiyono, “metodologi penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R & D,” in Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.
[12] S. Sukardi, D. Puyada, R. E. Wulansari, and D. T. P. Yanto, “The validity of interactive instructional media on electrical circuits at vocational high school and technology,” 2nd INCOTEPD, vol. 2017, pp. 21–22, 2017.
[13] D. T. P. Yanto, S. Sukardi, and D. Puyada, “Effectiveness of Interactive Instructional Media on Electrical Circuits Course : The Effects on Students Cognitive Abilities,” Proc. 4rd Int. Conf. Tech. Vocat. Educ. Train., vol. 2017, pp. 75–80, 2017.
[14] L. Becker, Analysis of Pretest And Posttest Scores With Gain Scores And Repeated Measures. Chicago: Mc Graw-Hill.
[15] S. Arikunto, The Fundamental of Educational Evaluations (Revised Edition). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2008.
[16] O. Candra and D. T. P. Yanto, “THE ACTIVE LEARNING STRATEGY ‘ EVERYONE IS A TEACHER HERE ’ TO IMPROVE STUDET LEARNING OUTCOMES,” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 616–623, 2020.
[17] H. Hamdani, D. T. P. Yanto, and R. Maulana, “Validitas Modul Tutorial Gambar Teknik dan Listrik dengan Autocad,” INVOTEK J. Inov. Vokasional dan Teknol., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 83–92, 2019.
[18] O. Candra, D. T. P. Yanto, and F. Ismanto, “PENGEMBANGAN PERANGKAT PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS PRAKTIKUM INKUIRI UNTUK MATA PELAJARAN MENGANALISIS RANGKAIAN LISTRIK,” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 62–74, 2020.
[19] S. Mikkonen, L. Pylväs, H. Rintala, P. Nokelainen, and L. Postareff, “Guiding workplace learning in vocational education and training: A literature review,” Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training. 2017.
[20] G. Blickle and H. A. Genau, “The two faces of fearless dominance and their relations to vocational success,” J. Res. Pers., vol. 81, pp. 25–37, 2019.
[21] Elfizon, Syamsuarnis, and O. Candra, “THE EFFECT OF STRATEGY OF TRAINING MODELS IN LEARNING ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION,” Proceeding 4th Int. Conf. Tech. Vocat. Educ. Train. Padang, vol. 8, no. 1, 2017.