Persepsi Mahasiswa tentang Peranan Perkuliahan Pedagogik Kejuruan dan Metoda Mengajar Khusus terhadap Kesiapan Mengajar

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Renika Br Sipahutar
Hambali Hambali

Abstract

This study aims to determine how students' perceptions of the role of Vocational Pedagogics and Metoda Mengajar Khusus (MMK) lectures on student teaching readiness. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research. The research population is the 2018 Electrical Engineering Education Study Program students who have passed the Vocational Pedagogics, Metoda Mengajar Khusus, and Program Pengalaman Lapangan Kependidikan (PPLK) courses, totaling 55 students. The sampling technique in this study was total sampling, meaning that the entire population was used as the research sample, namely 55 people. The instrument used in this research is a questionnaire with the provision of answers always, often, sometimes, rarely, and never. Based on the results of the study, the descriptive analysis obtained the average value of the respondent's level of achievement (TCR) for each indicator in the questionnaire was classified as good. This shows that the mean score of the dominant respondents' answers is high so that the TCR number can be obtained. Furthermore, the inductive analysis obtained the results of hypothesis testing that students' perceptions of the role of the Vocational Pedagogic course (X1) and the Metoda Mengajar Khusus course (X2) partially and simultaneously have a positive and significant influence on teaching readiness (Y).

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

[1] Suardi, E. Pedagogik. Bandung: Angkasa Offset. 1979.
[2] Susanto, R. Pemetaan kompetensi pedagogik dalam keterkaitan dimensi pengetahuan pedagogik dan profil karakteristik awal. JPPI (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia), 7(1), 164-171. 2021.
[3] Bukit, M. Strategi dan Inovasi Pendidikan Kejuruan. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2014.
[4] Padmadewi, Ni Nyoman, dkk. Pengantar Micro Teaching. Depok: Rajawali Pers. 2017.
[5] Asril, Drs. Zainal. Micro Teaching: Disertai dengan Pedoman Pengalaman Lapangan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. 2017
[6] Slameto. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya . Jakarta : Rineka Cipta. 2013.
[7] Sardiman. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. 2010.
[8] Azizah, N., & Rahmi, E. Persepsi Mahasiswa Tentang Peranan Mata Kuliah Micro Teaching Terhadap Kesiapan Mengajar Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Ekonomi UNP. Jurnal Ecogen, 2(2), 197-205. 2019.
[9] Mardiah, M., & Yulhendri, Y. Pengaruh IPK, Micro Teaching, dan Praktik Pengalaman Lapangan (PPL) terhadap Kompetensi Pedagogik Mahasiswa Calon Guru Jurusan Pendidikan Ekonomi FE UNP. Jurnal Ecogen, 3(1), 165-175. 2020.
[10] Rakhmat, Jalaluddin. Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya. 2013.
[11] Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2016.
[12] Arikunto, Suharsimi. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. 2010.
[13] Hair, Jr., Joseph F., et. Al. Multivariate Data Analysis. Fifth Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc. 2011.
[14] Wahyudi, R., & Syah, N. Hubungan minat menjadi guru dengan kesiapan mengajar mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Teknik bangunan. CIVED, 6(1). 2019.
[15] Zarrin, S., Wakhinuddin, S., & Andrizal, A. Sumbangan Beberapa Faktor Mata Kuliah Kependidikan Terhadap Minat Menjadi Guru Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Otomotif Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Padang. Automotive Engineering Education Journals, 7(1). 2018.