Persepsi Siswa Vokasi terhadap Perencanaan, Pelaksanaan dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Kerja Bengkel dan Gambar Teknik

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Sonia Dora
Hansi Efendi

Abstract

Based on the observations made, the learning process at SMK Negeri 1 Ranah Batahan is not in accordance with the subjects and student characteristics. Often student learning outcomes do not meet the minimum standard of completeness for practicum subjects and technical drawing. Many teachers, including vocational teachers, complain of difficulties in implementing the 2013 curriculum. The learning process needs to be updated so that students do not only receive information from their teachers, but also actively participate in finding information, data, and the knowledge they want to learn. For this reason, the teacher as a facilitator and motivator to optimize student learning should choose the right strategy to increase students' willingness to learn. For this reason, it is necessary to look at student responses regarding the planning, implementation and evaluation of workshop work subjects and technical drawings at SMKN 1 Ranah Batahan. Based on the results of the study, it was concluded that the students' opinions on planning, implementation of learning for Workshop Work Subjects and Technical Drawings of Class X Audio Video Engineering Skills Packages at SMK N 1 Ranah Batahan described the respondent's achievement level of 86.30% in the good category. As well as students' responses to the Evaluation of Subjects for Workshop Work and Technical Drawing Subjects with the respondent's achievement level of 87.11% in the good category.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

[1] A. Zulatama, A. Ambiyar, S. Sukardi, and A. T. Devega, “Kontribusi Prestasi Belajar, Pengetahuan K3 dan Pengalaman Prakerin Siswa dengan Kesiapan Kerja Siswa SMK Kelas XII di Lahat,” JTEV J. Tek. Elektro Dan Vokasional, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 96, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.24036/jtev.v8i1.115785.
[2] Y. Indarta, N. Jalinus, R. Abdullah, and A. D. Samala, “21st Century Skills : TVET dan Tantangan Abad 21,” EDUKATIF J. ILMU Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 4340–4348, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1458.
[3] L. L. Uran, “Evaluasi implementasi KTSP dan Kurikulum 2013 pada SMK se-Kabupaten Belu, Nusa Tenggara Timur,” J. Penelit. Dan Eval. Pendidik., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.21831/pep.v22i1.13309.
[4] Y. Indarta, N. Jalinus, W. Waskito, A. D. Samala, A. R. Riyanda, and N. H. Adi, “Relevansi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dengan Model Pembelajaran Abad 21 dalam Perkembangan Era Society 5.0,” EDUKATIF J. ILMU Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 3011–3024, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2589.
[5] F. Amran and T. Taali, “Pengaruh Motivasi dan Kreativitas Praktik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Pembelajaran Instalasi Penerangan Listrik,” J. Pendidik. Tek. Elektro, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 5–13, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.24036/jpte.v3i2.175.
[6] A. R. Riyanda, “Kreativitas Belajar, Tingkat Pendidikan Orang Tua, Dan Pendapatan Orang Tua Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Smk Al-Huda Jatimulyo Kabupaten Lampung Selatan,” J. Inov. Pendidik. Dan Teknol. Inf. JIPTI, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 56–61, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.52060/pti.v1i2.359.
[7] H. D. Saputra, F. Ismet, and A. Andrizal, “Pengaruh Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMK,” INVOTEK J. Inov. Vokasional Dan Teknol., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 25–30, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.24036/invotek.v18i1.168.
[8] N. S. Hanum, “Keefetifan e-learning sebagai media pembelajaran (studi evaluasi model pembelajaran e-learning SMK Telkom Sandhy Putra Purwokerto),” J. Pendidik. Vokasi, vol. 3, no. 1, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.21831/jpv.v3i1.1584.
[9] Y. Andrian and R. Rusman, “Implementasi pembelajaran abad 21 dalam kurikulum 2013,” J. Penelit. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 14–23, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.21831/jpipfip.v12i1.20116.
[10] S. Julaiha, “Implementasi Pendidikan Karakter dalam Pembelajaran,” Din. Ilmu, pp. 226–239, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.21093/di.v14i2.15.
[11] E. Pattanang, M. Limbong, and W. Tambunan, “Perencanaan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Di Masa Pandemi Pada Smk Kristen Tagari,” J. Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 112–120, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.33541/jmp.v10i2.3275.
[12] M. I. Pambudi, M. E. Winarno, and W. D. Dwiyogo, “Perencanaan dan Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani Olahraga Kesehatan,” J. Pendidik. Teori Penelit. Dan Pengemb., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 110, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.17977/jptpp.v4i1.11906.
[13] N. Azizah and M. Zainudin, “Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (Studi di SMK Muhammadiyah 1 dan SMK Muhammadiyah 2 Kota Palembang),” Edification J., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 133–143, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.37092/ej.v1i2.139.
[14] S. Samsiadi and M. N. Humaidi, “Efektivitas Google Form Sebagai Media Penilaian Dan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Pai Di Smk Negeri 1 Berau Kaltim,” Res. Dev. J. Educ., vol. 8, no. 2, p. 666, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.30998/rdje.v8i2.13634.
[15] M. Fitrah and R. Ruslan, “Eksplorasi Sistem Pelaksanaan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Bima,” J. Basicedu, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 178–187, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.639.