Evaluasi Kompetensi Mengajar Mahasiswa setelah Melaksanakan Praktek Lapangan Kependidikan pada Jurusan Kelistrikan di Kota Padang
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This study aims to describe the evaluation of students' competence in implementing PLK in electrical engineering majors to support the achievement of PLK goals and describe the differences in teaching competence of these students with other students who carry out PLK in different places but in the same city, namely Padang City. Education students at UNP are prepared to become competent and professional teacher candidates so that students are equipped from the start with the implementation of an educational field practice program by mastering various materials regarding education as a whole. Therefore the implementation of the PLK program needs to be evaluated for better program development. This research uses a quantitative approach with the type of evaluation research using the Goal Oriented Evaluation Model. The object of this research is the teaching competence of students. The subjects of this study were UNP Electrical Engineering Education students class of 2019 who had completed PLK. This research instrument uses a questionnaire. Based on the questionnaire data analysis results in terms of the four aspects of the assessment. From the results of the calculation of the frequency distribution of the 4 aspects of competency assessment, it can be seen that the pedagogical, personality and social competencies of students are in the very good category, while the professional competence is in the good category. In addition, there is no significant difference between the teaching competencies of students who carry out PLK majoring in electricity in the city of Padang.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[2] M. Dr.Sukardi, “Praktek lapangan,” p. 1, 2020.
[3] S. Saefiana, F. D. Sukmawati, R. Rahmawati, D. A. M. Rusnady, S. Sukatin, and S. Syaifuddin, “Teori Pembelajaran dan Perbedaan Gaya Belajar,” Mahaguru J. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 150–158, 2022, doi: 10.33487/mgr.v3i1.3976.
[4] S. Prayogi and H. Hastuti, “Evaluasi Kompentensi Profesional Mahasiswa dalam Melaksanakan PPLK Jurusan Teknik Elektro Universitas Negeri Padang,” J. Pendidik. Tek. Elektro, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 14–17, 2021, doi: 10.24036/jpte.v2i1.68.
[5] H. D. Febrian, “Evaluasi Kompetensi Mengajar Mahasiswa Dalam Melaksanakan PPLK Di SMKN 1 Kota Padang,” J. Pendidik. Tek. Elektro, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://repository.unp.ac.id/id/eprint/28085.
[6] T. Abkoria and D. Nora, “Kemampuan Profesional Mahasiswa Praktik Lapangan Kependidikan (Studi Mahasiswa Departemen Sosiologi Tahun Ajaran 2021/2022),” Naradidik J. Educ. Pedagog., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 262–272, 2022, doi: 10.24036/nara.v1i3.34.
[7] E. D. Sri Wulan Dari and Y. Yulhendri, “Analisis Kompetensi Profesional dan Kompetensi Pedagogik Mahasiswa Pendidikan Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Padang,” J. Ecogen, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 757, 2019, doi: 10.24036/jmpe.v2i4.7853.
[8] W. B. Pitaloka, N. Hermita, J. A. Alim, N. Fauza, D. A. Dipuja, and T. T. Wijaya, “Analyzing Pre-service Elementary School Teachers’ Personality Competence in Universitas Riau,” J. Pendiidkan Sekol. Dasar, vol. 4, no. June, pp. 37–43, 2021.
[9] J. Boimau and N. Mediatati, “Analisis Kompetensi Profesional, Pedagogik, Sosial dan Kepribadian Mahasiswa,” Pedagogika, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 26–41, 2020, doi: 10.37411/pedagogika.v11i1.110.
[10] S. Inayah, “Analisis Kompetensi Pedagogik Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Program Latian Profesi I (PLPI),” J. Handayani, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–12, 2016.
[11] R. Megawati and P. J. Kawatu, “Kompentensi Sosial Dan Kompetensi Kepribadian Mahasiswa PPL Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi Tahun Akademik 2018/2019,” vol. 5, no. 2, p. 5, 2019.
[12] D. Aulia and P. Martias, “Persepsi Guru Pamong Tentang Penguasaan Kompetensi Pedagogik dan Kompetensi Kepribadian Mahasiswa PLK FT-UNP di SMK,” MSI Trans. Educ., vol. 03, no. 4, 2022.
[13] G. Hadiprayitno, “Kompetensi Profesional Dan Pedagogi Mahasiswa Dalam Pelaksanaan Program Pengalaman Lapangan,” J. Cakrawala Pendidik., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 292–300, 2016, doi: 10.21831/cp.v15i2.8093.
[14] Suharsimi Arikunto and Jabar, Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2004.
[15] Suharsimi Arikunto, Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Revisi, Ce. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2007.
[16] G. Supriadi, Penelitian Pendidikan Metod1. Yogyakarta: UNY Press, 2019.
[17] P. D. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&B, 19th ed. Bandung: Bandung: Alfabeta, 2013.
[18] Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.
[19] Suharsimi Arikunto, Penelitian Tindakan. Yogyakarta: Aditya Media, 2010.
[20] K. Setiawan, “Buku Ajar Metodologi Penelitian (Anova Satu Arah),” Jur. Argonomi Dan Hortik. Fak. Pertan. Univ. Lampung, p. 186, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.penapersada.com.