Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Ujian Online Dengan E-Learning Universitas Negeri Padang

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Fivia Eliza
Ambiyar Ambiyar

Abstract

Learning using E-Learning has recently become part of education in Indonesia, however its implementation needs to be evaluated so that it meets standards. So, this research aims to start implementing Online exams using Padang State University E-Learning. This research is evaluation research using the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) approach. The research subjects were 30 students taking measurement and instrument lectures in the electrical engineering study program, Faculty of Engineering, Padang State University. The instrument used in this research was a questionnaire. The data was analyzed for the average value of the questionnaire which was classified and explained for each aspect of the evaluation. The research results that describe the implementation of Online exams with E-Learning at Padang State University are quite good, with average scores reflecting adequate quality. Context evaluation indicates the user's skill level and sufficient means available, although graphics and E-Learning content require further attention. Evaluation input shows good improvements in user capabilities and availability of E-Learning access facilities. The evaluation highlights the good process of using E-Learning applications, despite challenges in implementing assessments through the platform. Product evaluation shows that the quality and benefits of E-Learning are quite good. In conclusion, although the implementation of Online exams has provided positive benefits, there are still aspects that can be improved, such as the security of Online exams and more authentic evaluation methods. These findings provide valuable insight for further development in facing the dynamics of educational technology that continues to develop. The findings of this research open up opportunities for further exploration in the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in conducting Online exams.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

[1] G. Eason, B. Noble, and I. N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529–551, April 1955.
[2] F. Eliza, A. Asnil, V. I. Delianti, D. E. Myori, R. Fadli, and M. Hakiki, “Pelatihan Learning Management System (LMS) untuk Menyiapkan Guru-guru MGMP Teknik Ketenagalistrikan Sumbar dalam Mengelola Pembelajaran Daring,” Suluah Bendang: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 393–401, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.24036/sb.01840.
[3] Tri Monica Audina, F. Eliza, “Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Blended learning Pada Mata Pelajaran Alat Ukur dan Pengukuran,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 30–36, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.24036/JPTE.V4I1.254.
[4] D. T. P. Yanto, Ganefri, Sukardi, R. Kurani, and J. P. Yanto, “Examining the Practicality of Mobile-Based Gamification Assessment in Electrical Machine Course: A Study in Industrial Electrical Engineering,” Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science (JAETS), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 349–360, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.37385/JAETS.V5I1.2803.
[5] D. T. P. Yanto et al., “The Affecting Factors of Students’ Attitudes Toward the Use of a Virtual Laboratory: A Study in Industrial Electrical Engineering,” International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE), vol. 19, no. 13, pp. 4–16, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3991/IJOE.V19I13.41219.
[6] F. Eliza et al., “Revolution in Engineering Education through Android-Based Learning Media for Mobile Learning: Practicality of Mobile Learning Media to Improve Electrical Measuring Skills in the Industrial Age 4.0,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), vol. 17, no. 20, pp. 60–75, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3991/IJIM.V17I20.42093.
[7] R. L. Putra, A. Maulana, T. Iriani, and U. N. Jakarta, “Evaluasi Program Pelaksanaan Ujian Online Dengan Menggunakan Learning Management System Moodle Berbasis Android Di Smk Negeri 1 Jakarta,” Jurnal PenSil, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47–54, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.21009/JPENSIL.V8I1.8483.
[8] A. F. Berlianto, H. Ramadhan, and P. Pembangunan, “Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Asesmen Nasional Berstandar Komputer di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah,” Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 739–745, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.51169/IDEGURU.V8I3.623.
[9] S. Sudarsono and Mp. Balai Diklat Keagamaan Denpasar, “Evaluasi Inovasi Penyelenggaraan Ujian Dan Penilaian Online Pada Balai Diklat Keagamaan Denpasar ,” Widyadewata, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–10, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.47655/WIDYADEWATA.V2I1.29.
[10] F. A. Pratidina, R. I. Rokhmawati, and F. Amalia, “Analisis Pengaruh Penerapan Ujian Online bagi Siswa menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Studi Pada SMK Nasional Malang),” Jurnal Pengembangan Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 8672–8679, Sep. 2019, Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://j-ptiik.ub.ac.id/index.php/j-ptiik/article/view/6244
[11] Rezi Ramayanti, S. Sukardi, “Evaluasi Program Praktek Lapangan Indsutri Jurusan Teknik Elektro Universitas Negeri Padang,” Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1-8, Agu. 2021, doi: 10.24036/jpte.v2i2.90
[12] R. Roben and F. Eliza, “Evaluasi Perangkat Pembelajaran Kompetensi Keahlian Teknik Instalasi Tenaga Listrik Di SMK Negeri 1 Tilatang Kamang,” JTEV (Jurnal Teknik Elektro dan Vokasional), vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 243–247, Aug. 2020, Accessed: Jan. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jtev/article/view/109101
[13] A. Laksita, P. Guru Sekolah Dasar, and U. Kristen Satya Wacana, “Evaluasi Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar,” Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 8869–8878, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.31004/BASICEDU.V6I5.3906.
[14] S. Hamdi, S. Hamdi, Y. W. Purnomo, K. Hidayati, and N. Mu’minin, “Development of CBT Testlet Model for minimum competency assessment of numeracy literacy at elementary school level,” Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 242–257, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.21831/pep.v27i2.67473.
[15] Bulkani, R. Rahmaniati, and C. A. Putra, “Retest on Online Test: How Stable and Reliable?,” Review of International Geographical Education Online, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 2581–2590, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.48047/RIGEO.11.05.155.
[16] A. Sharma, K. Konar, K. Sanghvi, P. Churi, and N. T. Rao, “Perception of Students in Online Test in Engineering: Case of NMIMS University,” Proceedings - International Conference on Communication, Information and Computing Technology, ICCICT 2021, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ICCICT50803.2021.9510072.
[17] T. Kamal and A. Illiyan, “School teachers’ perception and challenges towards online teaching during COVID-19 pandemic in India: an econometric analysis,” Asian Association of Open Universities Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 311–325, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1108/AAOUJ-10-2021-0122.