Analisa Perbandingan Model Pembelajaran Project-Based Learning berbantuan Software Simurelay terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This research was conducted to determine whether there are significant differences in student learning outcomes using the Project-Based Learning model with and without simurelay software in the class XI Electric Motor Installation subject at SMKN 1 Bukittinggi. In the learning process for Electric Motor Installation at SMKN 1 Bukittinggi, the use of the Project-Based Learning model has not been implemented properly and still uses the lecture method, so learning focuses on educators which causes students to be less active and can reduce student learning outcomes. The Project-Based Learning model assisted by simurelay software increases student activity so that student learning outcomes increase and learning objectives are achieved. The type of research used is comparative research with a non-equivalent control group design. The subjects in this research were class XI students at SMKN 1 Bukittinggi in the 2023/2024 academic year. The instruments used in this research are pre-test and post-test (performance test). The research results obtained are that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes between learning using the Project-Based Learning model assisted by simurelay software and learning without simurelay software.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[2] B. Y. A. Aziizu, “Tujuan Besar Pendidikan Adalah Tindakan,” Pros. Penelit. dan Pengabdi. Kpd. Masy., vol. 2, no. 2, 2015, doi: 10.24198/jppm.v2i2.13540.
[3] M. Yusuf and A. Syurgawi, “Konsep Dasar Pembelajaran,” Al-Ubudiyah J. Pendidik. dan Stud. Islam, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.55623/au.v1i1.3.
[4] S. M. Setiawati, “Telaah Teoritis: Apa Itu Belajar ?,” Help. J. Bimbing. dan Konseling, vol. 35, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.36456/helper.vol35.no1.a1458.
[5] R. Festiawan, “Belajar dan pendekatan pembelajaran,” Univ. Jenderal Soedirman, 2020.
[6] T. Nabillah and A. P. Abadi, “Faktor Penyebab Rendahnya Hasil Belajar Siswa,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat. Sesiomadika 2019, 2019.
[7] A. Yandi, A. Nathania Kani Putri, and Y. Syaza Kani Putri, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengarui Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik (Literature Review),” J. Pendidik. Siber Nusant., vol. 1, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.38035/jpsn.v1i1.14.
[8] A. Aswardi, D. T. P. Yanto, C. Dewi, H. Zaswita, M. Kabatiah, and R. Kurani, “Human Machine Interface-Based Control Training Kit as Innovative Learning Media to Enhance Students’ Automation Control Skills in the Industry 4.0 Era,” TEM J., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 2157–2165, 2023, doi: 10.18421/TEM124-26.
[9] D.T.P. Yanto, C. Dewi, D. Yuvenda, R. Hidayat, and H. Zaswita, “Upskilling Guru Kejuruan melalui Pelatihan Kendali Motor Listrik Berbasis Variable Speed Drive,” J. Pendidik. Tek. Elektro, vol. 04, no. 02, pp. 497–504, 2023.
[10] F. Eliza, S. Suriyadi, and D. T. P. Yanto, “Peningkatan Kompetensi Psikomotor Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PjBL) di SMKN 5 Padang,” INVOTEK J. Inov. Vokasional dan Teknol., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 57–66, 2019, doi: 10.24036/invotek.v19i2.427.
[11] A. D. Laksono, “Keefektifan Model Project Based Learning Terhadap Keaktifan Dan Hasil Belajar Ipa Kelas V Sdn Sumberejo 2 Bonang,” JS (JURNAL SEKOLAH), vol. 2, no. 2, 2018, doi: 10.24114/js.v2i2.9516.
[12] D. T. P. Yanto, G. Ganefri, S. Sukardi, R. Kurani, and J. P. Yanto, “Examining The Practicality of Mobile-Based Gamification Assessment in Electrical Machine Course: A Study in Industrial Electrical Engineering,” J. Appl. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 349–360, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.37385/jaets.v5i1.2803..
[13] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.
[14] I. Irawan, “Klasifikasi Model Dan Teknik Evaluasi Pembelajaran,” ISLAMIKA, vol. 12, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.33592/islamika.v12i1.406.
[15] A. Santoso, “Studi Deskriptif Effect Size Penelitian-Penelitian Di Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma,” J. Penelitian, Fak. Psikol. Univ. Sanata Dharma, Yogyakarta, vol. Vol. 14, 2010.
[16] P. D. Sugiyono, “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Sugiyono,” Alfabeta, cv. 2017.
[17] U. Usmadi, “Pengujian Persyaratan Analisis (Uji Homogenitas Dan Uji Normalitas),” Inov. Pendidik., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 50–62, 2020, doi: 10.31869/ip.v7i1.2281.
[18] R. Sianturi, “Uji homogenitas sebagai syarat pengujian analisis,” J. Pendidikan, Sains Sos. dan Agama, vol. 8, no. 1, 2022, doi: 10.53565/pssa.v8i1.507.
[19] A. Muhajir Nasir, “Statistik Pendidikan,” Media Akad., 2016, doi: 10.31227/osf.io/judwx.
[20] S. Wassertheil and J. Cohen, “Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences,” Biometrics, vol. 26, no. 3, 1970, doi: 10.2307/2529115.