Korelasi antara Pengalaman Praktik Kerja Industri, Hasil Belajar dan Kemandirian Belajar dengan Kesiapan Kerja Peserta Didik Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
This study aims to identify the correlation between industrial work practice experience, learning outcomes of electric motor installation, and learning independence with the work readiness of TITL grade XII students, both individually and together. The type of research used is ex post facto with the population of students of the Electrical Power Installation Engineering (TITL) expertise program at SMKN 7 Surabaya and SMKN 2 Lamongan. The data collection technique involves the use of questionnaires for the variables of industrial work practice experience (X1), learning independence (X3), and job readiness (Y). Meanwhile, documentation was used to collect data on the learning outcome variable of electric motor installation (X2). The data analysis in this study includes prerequisite tests such as normality test, linearity test, multicollinearity test, and homoscedasticity test. Hypothesis testing is carried out using correlation and multiple regression techniques with the help of SPSS version 25 software for Windows. The results of this study are (1) There is a significant correlation between the experience of industrial work practices and the work readiness of class XII TITL students, (2) There is a significant correlation between the learning outcomes of Electric Motor Installation and the work readiness of class XII TITL students, (3) There is a significant correlation between learning independence and work readiness of class XII TITL students, and (4) There is a significant correlation between industrial work practice experience, learning outcomes of Electric Motor Installation, learning independence with the work readiness of class XII TITL students.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[2] Depdiknas, Undang-Undang No.20 Tahun 2003. 2003.
[3] Kemendikbud, “Serapan Lulusan SMK Berdasarkan Bidang Keahlian.” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://tracervokasi.kemdikbud.go.id/
[4] A. A. Tarawe et al., “Relationship of Job Involvements On Vocational School Students Job Satisfactions In Industrial Training,” Vocat. Tech. Educ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2013, doi: 10.5897/IJVTE2013.0122.
[5] E. D. Gagne, “The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning,” J. Pendidik. Ilmu Sos., vol. 23, no. 2, 1985. [6] H. Mujiman, “Manajemen Pelatihan Berbasis Belajar Mandiri,” Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, vol. 3, no. 1, 2007.
[7] E. Nurhayati, Psikologi Pendidikan Inovatif Edisi 2, vol. 6, no. August. 2016.
[8] R. Susanti and M. Mulyoto, “Kesiapan Kerja Siswa BLK Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Belajar, Motivasi Kerja dan Pengalaman On The Job Training,” Media Manaj. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.30738/mmp.v3i1.3424.
[9] S. BPS, “Pengangguran Terbuka Menurut Pendidikan Tertinggi yang Ditamatkan.” 2022. [Online]. Available: bps.go.id
[10] C. T. B. Denise F. Polit, Nursing research generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice 9th edition, vol. 34, no. 6. 2017.
[11] O. Hamalik, “Proses belajar mengajar / Oemar Hamalik,” Bumi Aksara. 2011.
[12] A. Fitriyanto, “Ketidakpastian Memasuki Dunia Kerja karena Pendidikan.,” Bandung PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.
[13] S. Wartini, “Strategi Manajemen Konflik Sebagai Upaya Meningkatkan Kinerja Teamwork Tenaga Kependidikan,” J. Manaj. dan Organ., vol. 6, no. 1, p. 64, 2016, doi: 10.29244/jmo.v6i1.12194.
[14] A. Tane, “Hubungan antar Manusia Pegawai Dinas Pendidikan Kota Payakumbuh,” J. Adm. Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 895–1265, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/bahana/article/view/5224%0Ahttp://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/bahan a/article/viewFile/5224/4113
[15] G. Saydam, Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Jakarta: Djambaran, 2005.
[16] R. Sondopen, A. Christi, and W. Suryowati, “Pengaruh Sikap Menghormati Menurut Roma 12: 16-18 Terhadap Perilaku Siswa/I Smu Kemala Bhayangkari 1 Surabaya,” Inculco J. Christ. Educ., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 212–223, 2023, doi: 10.59404/ijce.v3i2.152.
[17] P. M. Sari and Hendri, “Hubungan Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Produktif terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan,” J. Pendidik. Tek. Elektro, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 430–435, 2023, [Online]. Available: http://jpte.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/JPTE/article/view/355
[18] T. H. Prosser, C. A. & Quigley, “Prosser ’ s Sixteen Theorems on Vocational Education,” Vocat. Educ. a Democr. Am. Tech. Soc., pp. 1–4, 1949. 282
[19] P. P. Sari and U. T. Sontani, “Kontribusi prestasi belajar mata pelajaran produktif dan bimbingan karier terhadap kesiapan kerja siswa sekolah menengah kejuruan,” J. Pendidik. Manaj. Perkantoran, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32–46, 2021, doi: 10.17509/jpm.v4i2.18008.
[20] R. Rosmawati and R. I. Meilani, “Kontribusi mata pelajaran produktif dalam membangun kesiapan kerja siswa smk di Indonesia,” J. Pendidik. Manaj. Perkantoran, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 94, 2019, doi: 10.17509/jpm.v4i1.14960.
[21] U. Rahmawati and F. D. Patrikha, “Pengaruh Hasil Praktek Kerja Industri (PRAKERIN) dan Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Produktif terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa (Studi pada Siswa Kelas XII jurusan BDPM SMK Negeri 1 Surabaya),” J. Pendidik. dan Konseling, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1662–1672, 2022.
[22] I. F. Habibah and R. Dwijayanti, “Pengaruh Praktik Kerja Lapangan (PKL), Self-Efficacy dan Internal Locus of Control terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa SMKN Mojoagung Jombang,” J. Pendidik. Tata Niaga (JPTN, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 142–151, 2023.
[23] I. Lestari and B. T. Siswanto, “Pengaruh pengalaman prakerin, hasil belajar produktif dan dukungan sosial terhadap kesiapan kerja siswa SMK,” J. Pendidik. Vokasi, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 183–194, 2015, doi: 10.21831/jpv.v5i2.6384.
[24] Umar Tirtarahardja dan La Sulo, Pengantar Pendidikan ( edisi revisi). 2000.
[25] M. Novianska, Romdanih, and Nur Hasanah, “Kemandirian Belajar Peserta Didik Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Dengan Metode Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Secara Daring,” Pros. Semin. Nas. Pendidik. STKIP Kusuma Negara III, vol. III, no. 1, pp. 385–397, 2021.
[26] M. Al Fatihah, “Hubungan Antara Kemandirian Belajar dengan Prestasi Belajar PAI Siswa Kelas III SDN Panularan Surakarta,” At-Tarbawi J. Kaji. Kependidikan Islam, vol. 1, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.22515/attarbawi.v1i2.200.
[27] H. Wiharja, “Pengaruh Pengalaman Praktek Kerja Industry dan Internal Locus Of Control Terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa SMK,” J. Fam., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 48–54, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/familyedu/article/download/17578/9651
[28] A. F. Rahman, “Hubungan Internal Locus Of Control dan Dukungan Orang Tua Terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa Sekolah Menegah Kejuruan (SMK),” Psikoborneo J. Ilm. Psikol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 91–98, 2016, doi: 10.30872/psikoborneo.v4i1.3967.
[29] N. A. Puspitasari and M. D. Bahtiar, “Pengaruh Pengalaman Prakerin, Self Efficacy dan Internal Locus of Control Terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa SMK di Bidang Akuntansi,” J. Pendidik. Akunt., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 31–43, 2022, doi: 10.26740/jpak.v10n1.p31-43.
[30] A. C. R. Matindas, “Pengaruh kemandirian belajar dan pengalaman kerja industri terhadap kesiapan kerja siswa kelas XII Jurusan Teknik Kendaraan Ringan SMK N 3 Tondano,” vol. 4, 2023.
[31] A. J. S. Putra, “Hubungan kemandirian belajar dan pengalaman praktik kerja industri dengan kesiapan kerja siswa kelas XII jurusan teknik kendaraan ringan SMK N 1 Seyegan tahun ajaran 2013/2014,” Skripsi, 2014.
[32] A. F. Ramadhani and S. Suparji, “Hubungan Pengalaman Prakerin Dan Akademis Siswa Terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa SMK Jurusan Teknik Gambar Bangunan: Studi Meta-Analisis,” J. Kaji. Pendidik. Tek. …, 2021.