Studi Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Division dalam Pembelajaran Instalasi Penerangan Listrik
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
Based on the author's observations, the learning method at SMKN 5, a conventional learning system, still dominates Padang.Conventional learning systems and student learning outcomes have not been satisfactory, including in IPL subjects. Satisfactory, including in IPL subjects. This research aims to determine whether student learning outcomes using cooperative learning type STAD is better than conventional learning. This research hypothesizes that IPL learning outcomes of students using STAD-type cooperative learning are better than those of conventional learning. is better than IPL learning outcomes of students who use conventional learning in class XI of the Electrical The learning outcomes of students using STAD-type cooperative learning are better than those using conventional learning in class XI of the Electrical Department of SMKN 5 Padang. This research is experimental with the design model Randomized Control group-only design model. The sample of this study was students from class XI L2, which was the experimental class, and XIL3, the control class. Experimental class and XIL3 as a control class. The research instrument was a test. Data In this study, the data were processed using SPSS version 23.0 software. From the results of the study obtained the average learning outcomes of experimental class students are greater than those of the control class and from the t-test results obtained t-test results obtained a t value that was more significant than the t table; this means that STAD-type cooperative learning is better than conventional learning. STAD-type cooperative learning is better than conventional learning. In this research, This study also revealed that the learning completeness of experimental class students was also more significant than that of the control class.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
[2] A. A. P. Cattaneo, C. Antonietti, and M. Rauseo, “How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors,” Comput Educ, vol. 176, p. 104358, Jan. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPEDU.2021.104358.
[3] J. Sriana and Sujarwo, “Analisis Model Pembelajaran Kooperatife Tipe STAD Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa,” PEDAGOGI: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 39–51, 2022.
[4] D. T. P. Yanto, M. Kabatiah, H. Zaswita, G. Giatman, and H. Effendi, “Development of Virtual Learning using Problem-Based Learning Models for Vocational Education Students,” ELINVO (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education), vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 163–172, 2022, doi: 10.21831/elinvo.v7i2.52473.
[5] I. Wulandari and K. Kunci, “Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD ( Student Teams Achievement Division) dalam Pembelajaran MI,” 2022.
[6] D. T. P. Yanto, Sukardi, M. Kabatiah, H. Zaswita, and O. Candra, “Analysis of Factors Affecting Vocational Students’ Intentions to Use a Virtual Laboratory Based on the Technology Acceptance Model,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 94–111, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v17i12.38627.
[7] S. Utami, “Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Pada Pembelajaran Dasar Sinyal Video,” 2025.
[8] S. M. Sulubara, “Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Stad (Student Teams Achievement Division) Di SMP IT Muhammadiyah Takengon,” Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial Humaniora, vol. 2, no. 1.
[9] M. D. Simesso, T. S. Gutu, and W. M. Tarekegn, “The Contribution of Using Cooperative Learning Methods on Students’ Achievement and Retention in Secondary Schools during Chemistry Lesson,” Educ Res Int, vol. 2024, 2024, doi: 10.1155/2024/1830124.
[10] S. Kaymak, Zh.Kassymbek, A. Kalamkas, and F. Saydenov, “The Effect of Cooperative Learning on Students Academic Achievement,” Management Studies, vol. 9, no. 6, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.17265/2328-2185/2021.06.009.
[11] E. J. Wicaksana and M. E. Sanjaya, “Model PjBL pada Era Merdeka Belajar untuk Meningkatkan Sikap Ilmiah dan Kreativitas Mahasiswa Mata Kuliah Belajar dan Pembelajaran,” vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 193–200, 2021, doi: 10.23887/jipp.v6i1.
[12] E. Widayat, “Perbedaan Antara Model Problem Based Learning (PBL) Dengan Model Kooperatif Tipe (STAD) Student Team Achievement Division Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Dengan Langkah Polya,” vol. 3, pp. 1–8, 2022.
[13] R. E. Slavin, “Cooperative Learning,” Rev Educ Res, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 315–342, 1980, doi: 10.3102/00346543050002315.
[14] A. Rizka Suwanda, Masriani, and R. P. Sartika, “Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD: Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA Materi Hidrolisis Garam.”
[15] R. E. Slavin, “Cooperative Learning,” Rev Educ Res, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 315–342, 1980, doi: 10.3102/00346543050002315.
[16] A. Sulistio and N. Haryanti, “Model pembelajaran Kooperatif ( Cooperative Learning Model),” 2022.
[17] H. Wijaya and Arismunandar, “Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD berbasis Media Sosial,” Jurnal Jaffray, vol. 16, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.002.
[18] N. A. Sinaga and F. A. Ningtyas, “Implementasi Model Cooperative Learning Tipe STAD Untuk Meningkatkan Sikap Matematika Siswa,” Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 16–24, 2022.
[19] H. Gunarto, Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Teams Achievement Division Di Sekolah Dasar. 2013.
[20] I. Israil, “Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Learning Tipe STAD untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Belajar Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA di SMP Negeri 1 Kayangan,” 2019. [Online]. Available: http://ojs.ikipmataram.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkependidikan/
[21] M. Zega, “Analisis Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Pada Materi Matriks Di SMK Negeri 2 Lotu.,” 2023.
[22] D. Wicaksono and Iswan, “Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah di Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar MUhammadiyah 12 Pamulang, Banten,” 2019.
[23] S. Rahman, Pentingnya Motivasi Belajar Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar. 2021.
[24] D. W. Arukah, I. Fathurohman, and M. S. Kuryanto, “PENINGKATAN HASIL BELAJAR SISWA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MEDIA LEDU”.
[25] D. T. P. Yanto, F. Eliza, G. Ganefri, S. Sukardi, M. Kabatiah, and A. Andrian, “Android-Based Courseware as an Educational Technology Innovation for Electrical Circuit Course: An Effectiveness Study,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 1835–1843, 2023, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2023.13.12.1996.
[26] O. Candra and D. T. P. Yanto, “The Active Learning Strategy ‘ Everyone Is A Teacher Here ’ To Improve Studet Learning Outcomes,” Jurnal Pajar (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran), vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 616–623, 2020.
[27] W. Ramadhani, F. Azim, and H. Purwanto, “Pengaruh Penerapan Cooperative Learning Tipe STAD Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X Teknik Audio VideoDi SMK Negeri I Sumbar,” 2020.
[28] A. Shahnaz Ruhil Maulani, B. Supriadi, and L. Nuraini, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika Di SMK Negeri 5 Jember,” 2020, [Online]. Available: http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/STF
[29] B. J. B. Dede, “PengaruhModel Pembelajaran Kooperatif tipe STAD ( Student Teams Achievement Division) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Sistem Pendingin di Kelas XI TKRO 1 SMK Negeri 1 PalangkaraRaya Tahun Ajaran 2018/2019,” Jurnal Mahasiswa PTK Parentas, vol. 5, no. 2, 2019.