Analisis Penguasaan TPACK Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Elektro sebagai Calon Guru Abad 21

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Nur Asyifah
Hansi Effendi

Abstract

The rapid development of technology demands that prospective teachers master integrating technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge (TPACK). This study aims to analyze TPACK mastery among Electrical Engineering Education students as prospective 21st-century teachers. Using a quantitative descriptive method, data were collected from 74 students who had completed or were undergoing Teaching Field Practice (PLK) through a validated and reliable questionnaire. The results indicate that students' mastery is in the Good to Very Good category across the seven TPACK components. Specifically, Technological Knowledge (TK), Content Knowledge (CK), Technological Content Knowledge (TCK), and Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK) were in the Very Good category. In contrast, Pedagogical Knowledge (PK), Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK), and the integrated TPACK fell into the Good category. This shows that while students possess strong technological and content competencies, the integration of these aspects with pedagogical strategies to create comprehensive and effective learning experiences still requires development. Therefore, enhancing pedagogical understanding is essential to develop vocational teacher candidates who are innovative and adaptable to advancements in educational technology.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

References

[1] U. H. Salsabila and N. Agustian, “Peran Teknologi Pendidikan Dalam Pembelajaran,” Islam. J. Keislam. dan Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 123–133, 2021, doi: 10.55681/sentri.v3i7.3115.
[2] N. Kania, “Pendidikan Di Era DigitaL,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378494193
[3] M. J. Koehler and P. Mishra, “What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?,” Contemp. Issues Technol. Teach. Educ., vol. 9, no. (1), pp. 60–70, 2009, doi: 10.1177/002205741319300303.
[4] I. S. Utami and Y. Guantara, “Pengembangan Instrumen Self Assessment Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Tpack) Calon Guru Fisika: Aplikasi Structural Equation Modelling (Sem),” Pros. Semin. Nas. Pendidik. IPA Tahun 2021 “Redesain Pembelajaran IPA yang Adapt. di Masa Pandemi Covid-19,” 2021.
[5] M. Idris Effendi, H. Elmunsyah, and Widiyanti, “Peran Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) terhadap Ketercapaian 4C Skills (Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, Collaboration, and Communication) Siswa SMK,” Didakt. J. Kependidikan, vol. 13, no. 001, pp. 435–444, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://jurnaldidaktika.org
[6] A. Aspar, “Peningkatan Kompetensi Teknologi Informasi Guru Min 1 Ketapang Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Tahun Pelajaran 2020/2021,” J. Pembelajaran dan Pendidik. Karakter, vol. Vo. 1, no. 1, p. 10, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://jurnal.pendikar.untan.ac.id/index.php/jp2k/article/view/12%0Ahttps://jurnal.pendikar.untan.ac.id/index.php/jp2k/article/viewFile/12/12
[7] D. Yudiana, T. Iriani, and R. E. Murtinugraha, “Analisis Kemampuan Technological, Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) Calon Guru Vokasional Pendidikan Teknik Bangunan,” J. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–11, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.47134/jtp.v1i3.331.
[8] U. Furqon Arbianto, Widiyanti, and D. Nurhadi, “Kesiapan Technological, Pedagogical And Content Knowledge (Tpack) Calon Guru Bidang Teknik di Universitas Negeri Malang,” J. Tek. Mesin dan Pembelajaran, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–9, 2018, doi: 10.17977/um054v1i2p1-9.
[9] A. Reski and D. K. Sari, “Analisis Kemampuan TPACK Guru Fisika Se-Distrik Merauke,” Jurnla Kreat. Online, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2020.
[10] T. Handayani, N. Aprilia, A. Susanti, and Alpendi, “Analisis Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Calon Guru Biologi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan,” Bioedukasi (Jurnal Pendidik. Biol., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 16–20, 2023, doi: 10.24127/bioedukasi.v14i1.7769.
[11] Hardani et al., Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitaif, I. Yogyakarta: CV. Pustaka Ilmu Group, 2020.
[12] K. Abdullah et al., Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Aceh, 2022.
[13] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. ALFABETA, 2013.
[14] Amruddin, R. Priyanda, T. S. Agustina, N. S. Ariantini, N. G. A. L. Rusmayani, and Dkk, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif, vol. 1. Sukoharjo: Pradina Pustaka, 2022. [Online]. Available: http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_Sistem_Pembetungan_Terpusat_Strategi_Melestari
[15] D. A. Schmidt, E. Baran, A. D. Thompson, P. Mishra, M. J. Koehler, and T. S. Shin, “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK):The Development and Validation of an Assessment Instrument for Preservice Teachers,” J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 123–149, 2009.
[16] Usmeldi, “Panduan ringkas penulisan skripsi,” 2025.
[17] B. Rahmatullah, H. Praherdhiono, and A. Wedi, “Analisis Kompetensi Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge Pada Guru Sekolah Vokasi Kemaritiman,” Edcomtech J. Kaji. Teknol. Pendidik., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 186–198, 2021, doi: 10.17977/um039v6i12021p186.
[18] R. S. Wahyuningtyas and W. Oktamarsetyani, Tpack Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge, I. Jakarta: UKI PRESS, 2023.